requestId:68499addd82036.40328915.
The “Innovation and Confucian Business” performance
Author: Olin
Source: Author: Baocai Sweetheart Network Authorized by Confucian Network
Original from the WeChat publication of “Qingming Bookstore”
Time: Confucius was in the 2570 year of the year, August 26th, Jiazi
src=”https://static.rujiazg.com/storage/article/640.webp-86.jpg!article_800_auto” style=”font-family: “Helvetica Neue”, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;”>
Introduction
Since the proposal of General Li Keqiang in 2014 to “large-scale innovation, thousands of innovations” to tomorrow, it will be released in the country. In previous years, Jingdu’s double-creation index ranked fourth in the country, and the city’s patent application has exceeded 100,000 Sweetdrawing Network.
For this conclusion, it makes people “a happy cover the price and the other one”. Fortunately, policy protection can allow everyone to gain a platform to realize its value. But what is wrong is that all opportunities are dangerous. Even if we can see news about innovation success and innovation every day, there are only a few people who can truly create and innovate, and most of them will still fail and fall into the news.
This report tomorrow is important to use Confucian resources to discuss two issues, one is the innovative view of Confucianism, and the other is the meaning of Confucianism for modern merchants, and hope it will not be of no benefit to everyone.
Innovation
When you talk about innovation, you will definitely hear a word called innovative thinking. People often say that innovative thinking can innovate.
What is innovative thinking? According to the definition, the so-called innovative thinking refers to the ability to break through the boundaries of common rules and thinking about problems in a way that is extraordinary and even changes the rules, and propose solutions to differences with the public, thereby producing new, independent, and socially meaningful thinking results.
According toIn this way, the important reason why people do not have innovative talents is that they have problems with their thinking methods. Or maybe it is said that normal thinking methods lack innovation. Only effective thinking methods that transcend or change their thinking methods can produce new thinking results.
Everyone is advocating this kind of concept, but it may not necessarily be reflected on it. Can changing thinking be innovative? This not only reminds us of some traditional fables. The owner of these fables has a private coordination point, which is to use very regular thinking methods, and the result of their thinking is also fresh, but they are generous.
Influenced by the Eastern teachings, the teachers all said that they should break the rules and break the rules. People have been breaking rules for many years, but what we see is more about not following rules. Failure to follow rules does not mean breaking rules. What kind of person can break the rules? As long as the most familiar with the rules, the people who understand the rules best understand the rules are the ones who understand the rules best. To put it as an example, in the past we have criticized the Chinese-style death record and mechanical repetitive teaching, and believed that it had severed the students’ invested the amount of money creativity. But tomorrow, Chinese people taught this have shown great innovation talents. For example, sharing economy and I have enjoyed the benefits of sharing economy. The latest innovation is 5g, and 5g technology is just a first guide. What is really worth waiting for is the interaction between all things in the 5g era.
To put it more deeply, when we break the rules in the eyes of others, we will definitely find that in fact, we have not broken the rules, but we have the ability to see and abide by a more huge and deep rule that mortals cannot see. For example, Niutton’s classical power was regarded as true for hundreds of years, and then in the past century, relative theory and quantum power achieved the transcendence of classical physics. In the eyes of everyone, Einstein and others broke through the previous rules. In fact, they only pointed out a more huge and realistic rule.
At that time, many training classes for innovative thinking are more about changing their thinking methods. People are willing to spend a lot of money and are so arrogant. The reason for this is that many people are looking forward to learning a new thinking method, thinking that by using this thinking method, you can innovate forever. I think there are classes for learning piano, chess, calligraphy, singing and dancing. Only the unique innovation cannot be learned in the learning class. Because a new thinking and a new invention are not the result of thinking with very regular thinking methods, but after extensive and profound learning, through common thinkingThe result.
Many people think that innovation is to think of a good point, and that creativity that others have never thought of can bring endless benefits. They insist on thinking about a few points every day, and in other words, one can always work. But why do most people think of many unrealistic points, and never have a reliable and useful point? This requires understanding the thinking mechanism of humans.
Where did our points come from? They seemed to be empty, and it seemed that a bubble suddenly appeared on the lake. In fact, the presentation of each point comes from our existing knowledge system. The knowledge system is the gathering of all knowledge of a person. Because each person’s knowledge system is different, even in the face of the same work, the designs it generates must be different.
In the case of a hotel, a person’s knowledge system is just like the kind of ingredients in a hotel. The owner of the hotel orders is similar to the request of the inner environment. Our recipes seem to be made into dishes.
If the hotel often buys dishes, the hotel’s ingredients will be rich. Whatever the owner wants, we can immediately make something that he is satisfied with. On the contrary, if the hotel does not buy vegetables frequently, then the things delivered will never be as satisfied with him. On the contrary, the more abundant the ingredients in the hotel, the less it will be difficult for the owner to complain.
Similarly, when it comes to requests from the outside environment, a person always has no good points, but because his knowledge is not well-equipped and the existing knowledge system lacks natural good points. On the contrary, a person can always produce novel ideas, precisely because his knowledge is extremely rich and unsatisfied.
So, in how to permeate himself, the heroine has achieved good results in every topic, and has become the lowest-achieving Ye Qiu’s innovative talent. From a Confucian perspective, it can give a very profound conclusion with the public.
The Master said: “When you warm the old, you know the new, and you can be a teacher.” We learned this sentence in elementary school in literary books. It’s not just a warm past, but also a clear understanding of new knowledge. It seems that elementary school students first write their work in a warm and unhealthy way, and then prepare the content they want to learn today. This is a good student who lacks the ability to be a teacher.
The old is warm and the new is known. The focus of this sentence is not on the old, nor on the new, but on the word “公” in the middle and “公” in the verb, all express the simultaneity behind and behind. For example, “If you want to stand up, you will stand up, and if you want to reach, you will stand up to others.” The process of being warm is the process of knowing the new. If you go to know the new, you will not be able to achieve the goal, you will not have enough knowledge to prepare, and you will see the old ones.I think it’s new, but I don’t recognize it when I see it. Only by familiarizing yourself with the work you have developed in the past can you understand what is new.
Please care
Those who doubt the present should observe the past; those who do not know the past should consider the past. “Tube·Shaping”
Authorizes an example. Two systems in one country. There are two systems in one country, namely “one country, two systems of relay”. This system does not exist in the world, it is an absolute innovation. We will still say that the two systems in the country are the great innovations of fellow Dun Xiaoping.
Two systems in a country can be said to solve a global political problem. Are two systems really invented by the void? Otherwise. We often say that there is nothing new under the sun. We think something is fresh because we know too little about what is happening under the sun. Two systems in one country have prototypes in Chinese history. Confucian politica
