requestId:684c3e4fa7d885.87562264.
The Words of the Sage——About the Roots, Arithmetics and Directions of Confucius’ Language
Author: Yang Qinghui
Source: “Hainan Major Research” (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition) 2021 Issue 3
[Abstract] How to face Confucius’ language? Neither falls into the trap of multi-theory, theory, or concept in the Eastern theory, nor can he revisit or re-record the reality of Confucius’ language in tomorrow’s language. The feasible way may be to deeply clarify the text with a cautious attitude so that it can move from the perspective of Confucius and gain closer to his language. The research and development found that in the exquisite, profound and highly contaminated expression of the relevant text, Confucius’ language is both subtle and extensive. Its language is not logic, it does not rely on reasoning, nor does it mean to clarify the world, nor does it mean to be abstract. Instead, he respected the words of the ancient sage kings and used them as a model to summon people from the basis of human beings – virtue. Under the call of language, people are directed into specific actions of becoming virtuous, becoming adults and even becoming sanctified. When language meets its mission, it retreats to speechlessness. At this point, the entire universe becomes the lasting movement of heavenly virtue—the Tao. Finally, language appears from the beginning, and expresses its complete inconclusive method as a rebirth of the “Dao of Heaven”.
[Keyword] Confucius; language; virtue; the way of nature
[Author’s introduction] Yan Qinghua (1986-), male, from Lengshuijiang, Hunan, and a doctoral student from the School of Humanities of the Jin Dynasty. The purpose of the discussion is pre-Qin Philosophy, Song and Ming Philosophy, and Chinese Medicine Consciousness History.
They have always praised the “three words” and think that “fables” “recent words” “speaking words” can be as wonderful as the language; or they may be obsessed with words, wandering in metaphors and stick-to-mouth opportunities, thinking that “words are used as meanings, and words are not meanings” is enough to break the vassal of language. Little do they know that Confucius’ language seems to be “no handle” [1], which is actually very subtle; it seems fair, but it is actually very superb. Han scholar An Lezhe believed that Confucius was a “communication master” [2]. In addition to those who studied Confucius’ language, including Hao Dawei, An Lezhe, Chen Hansheng and others who studied on the subject of the study of Confucius’ overall language, most of them pointed out that “the philosophy of pre-Qin language began with bearing Confucius” [3], in actual research, they mostly stayed in the research of “Correction of Names” or stick to “Factory” The analysis of several fragmented concepts such as “Yes and Meaning” may be possible to pay attention to the problem of “No words” but the overall movement of Confucius’ language is not considered. Through profound reading of related texts, this article evaluates Confucius’ language structure and its specific development methods in language practice, and hopes thatUse this to enter the world of Confucius’ language and understand the true meaning of his language.
1Baobao.com comparison, language based on: Correcting the name
“Theory·Zilu” notes Zilu, Zilu, asked Confucius, “When you treat your son and do political work, why should you be the first?” Confucius said: “Is it necessary to correct your name!” Regarding “Changing the name”, the annotators in history have argued. But whether it is to say “correct words” [4], or “correct name” [5], or “correct name of every thing” [6], or even “concept” “model” [7], as today’s scholars have expressed their meaning, they are not verbal meanings, and have even left Confucius’ language under many circumstances. Since the mission of this article is to discuss Confucius’ language, it should be asked whether “reforming the name” can become a circle in its language structure? If so, what is the meaning in the language structure? To answer this question, you must first enter the realm of Confucius in order to clarify the meaning of “correcting your name”. Let’s look at:
If the reputation is not right, the words are not smooth; if the words are not smooth, the things will not be successful; if the things are not successful, the gift will not be happy; if the gift is not happy, the punishment will not be defeated; if the punishment will not be defeated, the people will be at a loss. Therefore, a correct person’s name must be spoken, and a statement must be performed. If you correct your words, you will be completely punished. [8]
Wen Haiming once emphasized: “Talk with fame and act with fame.” [9] The development of “name” is based on the occurrence of words and words, and ultimately, action has a basis. Therefore, in the order of occurrence of “name-word-action”, the one located in the middle happens to be “word” [10]. If we use this to examine the historical stigma about “correcting the name” and it will be found that most of the central position of “word” is cancelled, resulting in the result that the “name domain” is directly crossing the “track domain”. In other words, the main meanings of language are erased. Therefore, some contemporary researchers believe that Confucius only “focus on the connotation of political ethics of name” [11], or perhaps said, “only focus on viewpoints and standpoints rather than ‘true connotation’” [12]. Some scholars even believe that Confucius used “correcting the name” to block the “word” of the whole country, so that he became a solid “word authority” [13]!
“It is necessary to correct a person’s name.” Not only should “talkable”, but also to “talk smoothly”. This Sweetheart Baobabaobaobao.com is exactly the task of “famous”. On the contrary, if you want to “ I know more about the names of birds, plants and trees. I refer to names and calls, and in “There is no name for people who have no world but are not called.” In “There is no name for people to be called,” I mean “describing” and “There is no name for people to be called,” and “There is no name for people to be aware of.” In short, “Name” is both a famous name and a name, and a lyric term, and a lyric term that is also a lyric term—the action of determining names; therefore, “Speech” says: “Name means self-determination. From the night of the mouth. In the evening, people cannot see each other in the dark, so they are named by their own mouth. ”
When “name” is called the noun, the meaning is: First, to make the object reveal itself to the person, that is, to be cautious, “The underworld does not see each other, so the mouth is called by one’s own metaphor. Things are the most important, and “The underworld does not see each other”, because “name” can be seen. Second, it points to a certain constant nature. After all, things change, high and low are unpredictable. Only by “name” can one be “concentrated” in the flow and keep it to its own way. Famous scholars and Mr. Huang have a better understanding of this statement, such as “Yin Wenzi·Big Way” says: “Name determines things”, and “Huang Emperor Four Books·Original Way” says: “Talk it with its name, and all things are determined by themselves.” Third, it means that a certain type is distinguished and judged. Dong Zhongshu says: “Name is the reason for something different. ” 【14】There is a chaotic situation, because of “name”, you can learn from each other’s own kind and get their place. Therefore, Dong Zi said, “Each thing is smooth and the name” [15].
But when he continued to pursue the word “name” as a verb, he found that Confucius did not explain too much. He seemed not to be Explore the basis for the name, so that the subsequent debates have been endless. Is this a mystery Confucius’ inability to know this problem? Perhaps it was because he understood the reconciliation of the problem that he decided to choose to avoid it and to change the “name” to “correct”?
No matter how important it is to emphasize “real” (realBaobao Message Board) The “Fantasy School” that makes “name” or “destiny” become “name” [16] will all encounter difficulties from themselves. The problem with the former is that if “real” is first in Born the story “Name”, then who knows this “True”? Or maybe who is the “True”? “True” does not take the initiative to show people. It must use “True” to
發佈留言